• Boycott calls mount after Minneapolis unrest

Just months before the world’s biggest sporting event kicks off, U.S. President Donald Trump has ignited a fresh wave of political and security controversy around the 2026 FIFA World Cup, openly hinting at the possible deployment of National Guard troops in five host cities. Observers described the move as a “militarization” of the tournament, while the White House framed it as an “absolute security necessity.”

Security solution sparks concern

In press remarks delivered amid rising domestic tensions, the 79-year-old president confirmed his willingness to adopt a “hard-line security approach” to safeguard major events.

Trump said, “We’ll do it again if necessary. We’ll make sure the Olympic Games (Los Angeles 2028) and the World Cup are extremely safe.” Although he did not name the five cities in question, reports suggest they could be among the 11 U.S. venues set to host matches—some of which have recently seen unrest.

The warnings come at a sensitive moment, as the United States reels from deadly clashes in Minneapolis, Minnesota, following Trump’s deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) forces. The confrontations left two people dead and ignited protests, prompting rights groups and sports figures to renew calls to boycott the 2026 edition.

World Cup map and the 48-team challenge

Despite the political noise, organizers continue preparations for kickoff on June 11 at Mexico City’s Azteca Stadium, where the opening match is set to feature Mexico against South Africa.

This edition holds special significance for the Arab world, with a historic seven Arab national teams expected to participate—Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Qatar, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia—and a strong chance of rising to eight should Iraq advance through the intercontinental playoff next March.

Between safety and repression

FIFA faces a real dilemma in balancing reassurances from its president, Gianni Infantino, with on-the-ground realities that could see National Guard forces deployed in major cities such as Los Angeles by Trump’s decision.

Critics argue that a military presence around stadiums could intimidate international fans and dampen the spirit of football’s global celebration, while the U.S. administration insists national security must come before any other consideration.

As the final, scheduled for July 19 in New Jersey, draws closer, one question remains: can football ease political tensions, or will “Trump’s World Cup” become the most divisive tournament in the sport’s history?